Rabbi Judah ha-Nasi (latter half of the second and beginning of the third century C.E.), considered to be the redactor of the Codification of basic Jewish Oral Law; edited and arranged by R. Judah ha-Nasi c. 200 C.E. Mishnah , made a statement that started a trend of legal development resulting in the elimination of the category of normal menstruation and its replacement by the category of abnormal bleeding, ziva. His statement reflects the possible confusion in keeping track of one’s period, especially in light of the new system of pithei niddah. If this was done intentionally, the couple incurred the punishment of karet; if done unintentionally, they were obligated to bring a sin offering. Atonement by sacrifice, however, could not be made after the destruction of the Temple in the year 70 C.E. Great efforts were therefore made to prevent inadvertent sins of this nature. Joseph citing Rav Judah who had it from Rav stated: Rabbi ordained at Sadot: If a woman observed a discharge on one day she must wait six days in addition to it. If she observed discharges on two days she must wait six days in addition to these. If she observed a discharge on three days she must wait seven clean days.”
Later on he endured in order to pray
Which report by the Rabbi Judah ha-Nasi fundamentally eliminated most of the menstruating people on normal monthly period category and you will placed him or her regarding the irregular reputation regarding zava since the majority typical attacks last at least three days. Seem to his concern are one because of the state-of-the-art clarifications needed to choose when you’re niddah assuming it’s possible to become a great zava, you to might reach not work right that have grievous effects. Initial the fresh decree got restricted effect; it seems for come local, and may was simply for times when doubt is actually in it and also the local inhabitants wasn’t well enough learned to choose in such as for instance factors ( Rabbi Solomon ben Isaac; b. Troyes, France, 1040 Rashi ). Yes it was not a standard decree for everyone out of Israel, nevertheless was step one because recommendations. In the 1st a few examples, Rabbi’s declaration works with a woman whom could be a small zava or possibly a great niddah. She’s managed in the 1st situation because a good niddah, that have an excellent 7-time chronilogical age of impurity, in place of one day out-of impurity during the day from hemorrhaging, the rule getting a zava. On 2nd example the woman is addressed as the a good niddah and you can a zava in the event the first day is inside the the lady ziva period (the eleven days between monthly period attacks). In the 3rd state, this woman is handled as an entire zava. Every around three rulings make a whole lot more strict condition.
BT Niddah 66a provides Rabbi’s statement: “R
Subsequent statements by other sages make it absolutely certain that it was understood to be a general ent are from the amoraim, the sages who created the Palestinian and Babylonian Talmudim. Amoraim could not dispute tannaitic rulings without tannaitic support but they created fences around the Torah to prevent inadvertent sins. We find a aic) “spokesman.” Scholars active during the period from the completion of the Mishnah (c. 200 C.E.) until the completion of the Jerusalem and Babylonian Talmuds (end of the fourth and fifth centuries respectively), who were active primarily in the interpretation of the Mishnah. In the chain of tradition they follow the tanna’im and precede the savora’im. amora Rav Huna in JT Berakhot (5:1, 8d): “Rav Huna said: One who sees a drop of blood like [the size of a] mustard seed sits and keeps [because of it] seven clean days. ” The statement was made as an example of an undisputed law from which one could then turn to prayer. Such a law would clear one’s mind because there were no arguments about it, Polyamorous dating review thereby allowing one to focus totally on prayer. Rav Huna’s statement is much more radical than the tannaitic version quoted above. According to him, all women who see uterine blood are in the category of the complete zava, regardless of the size of the blood stain and despite the normalcy of menstruation or having seen such blood only one or two days.
