Rabbi Judah ha-Nasi (latter half of the second and beginning of the third century C.E.), considered to be the redactor of the Codification of basic Jewish Oral Law; edited and arranged www.datingmentor.org/cs/foot-fetish-seznamka/ by R. Judah ha-Nasi c. 200 C.E. Mishnah , made a statement that started a trend of legal development resulting in the elimination of the category of normal menstruation and its replacement by the category of abnormal bleeding, ziva. His statement reflects the possible confusion in keeping track of one’s period, especially in light of the new system of pithei niddah. If this was done intentionally, the couple incurred the punishment of karet; if done unintentionally, they were obligated to bring a sin offering. Atonement by sacrifice, however, could not be made after the destruction of the Temple in the year 70 C.E. Great efforts were therefore made to prevent inadvertent sins of this nature. BT Niddah 66a gives us Rabbi’s statement: “R. Joseph citing Rav Judah who had it from Rav stated: Rabbi ordained at Sadot: If a woman observed a discharge on one day she must wait six days in addition to it. If she observed discharges on two days she must wait six days in addition to these. If she observed a discharge on three days she must wait seven clean days.”
Amoraim could not dispute tannaitic rulings in the place of tannaitic service nonetheless written fences inside the Torah to eliminate inadvertent sins
Which report by the Rabbi Judah ha-Nasi essentially got rid of every menstruating females in the regular monthly period category and you may set them on the unpredictable position of zava since most typical attacks history at the least 3 days. Frequently his matter is that considering the state-of-the-art clarifications needed to decide whenever one is niddah and if you can getting a good zava, you to might come to go wrong with grievous outcomes. First the brand new decree had minimal impact; it appears to own become local, and could was in fact restricted to times when question are inside it and also the regional society was not sufficiently read to determine into the eg situations ( Rabbi Solomon ben Isaac; b. Indeed it wasn’t an over-all decree for everyone away from Israel, it try step one in this guidelines. In the 1st two examples, Rabbi’s statement works closely with a female who is generally a small zava or possibly a beneficial niddah. The woman is handled in the 1st situation as an excellent niddah, that have an effective 7-time period of impurity, in the place of one-day out-of impurity for the day from bleeding, which is the laws getting a zava. On the next analogy the woman is managed due to the fact an effective niddah and you can a small zava if your first day ended up being into the the lady ziva period (the fresh eleven days between menstrual periods). From the 3rd state, she’s handled because an entire zava. The three rulings use the way more strict status.
Troyes, France, 1040 Rashi )
Subsequent statements by other sages make it absolutely certain that it was understood to be a general ent are from the amoraim, the sages who created the Palestinian and Babylonian Talmudim. We find a aic) “spokesman.” Scholars active during the period from the completion of the Mishnah (c. 200 C.E.) until the completion of the Jerusalem and Babylonian Talmuds (end of the fourth and fifth centuries respectively), who were active primarily in the interpretation of the Mishnah. In the chain of tradition they follow the tanna’im and precede the savora’im. amora Rav Huna in JT Berakhot (5:1, 8d): “Rav Huna said: One who sees a drop of blood like [the size of a] mustard seed sits and keeps [because of it] seven clean days. Afterwards he stood to pray.” The statement was made as an example of an undisputed law from which one could then turn to prayer. Such a law would clear one’s mind because there were no arguments about it, thereby allowing one to focus totally on prayer. Rav Huna’s statement is much more radical than the tannaitic version quoted above. According to him, all women who see uterine blood are in the category of the complete zava, regardless of the size of the blood stain and despite the normalcy of menstruation or having seen such blood only one or two days.
