Information and methods
To research stereotypes off subgroups of females and you may people, i first conducted a great airplane pilot research in order to amass a list of latest sex subgroups during the Norwegian people.
Airplane pilot Investigation
Users (Letter = 60) have been reached publicly in town heart from Bergen, Norway, and you can expected to take part in an initial survey on the which organizations they sense that women and boys into the society try split up directly into. Among the participants, 50.0% was basically the weblink people. A good forty-eight.3% were men (you to new member didn’t answer fully the question regarding the intercourse/intercourse 2 ) plus the imply age is (SD = , variety 18–79). Most (90.0%) did not have an enthusiastic immigrant history. Others had either immigrated by themselves (6.7%) otherwise was basically Norwegian produced to a single or a few immigrant mothers (1.7%). One to participant didn’t answer the backdrop matter.
The tuition to the players is due to the fact: ‘There are many different “types” of females in the present society. Excite take note of as much different types of female (age.grams., mothers of young children, businesswomen) as possible think of.’ All of those other page try left blank on participant to write on the. Into the a different web page, a comparable classes making reference to type of men was shown. The transaction out of presentation are counterbalanced in order for half of the players listed female very first, the other 50 % of detailed people very first.
On average, the participants indexed eight.twenty eight different varieties of girls (SD = 4.07, range 0–21) and you will 7.42 different varieties of people (SD = cuatro.47, diversity 0–24). Three standards was basically useful to determine which organizations is chosen as stimuli communities however analysis: (a) the team had to be mentioned by at the very least five participants, (b) we needed to possess teams away from some other social spots and you can classes (e.grams., communities discussed from the relatives and you can top-notch jobs and you can intimate orientations), and you will (c) we planned to make sure we had synchronous men and women subgroups (elizabeth.grams., men politicians and you may girls politicians, unmarried moms and dads, and unmarried dads) to helps evaluations of people occupying an identical personal part and classification. All of our choices you to definitely a groups will be stated by four participants is informed from the early in the day composed really works (age.g., Lee and you will Fiske, 2006; Durante et al., 2013) however, was also pragmatic in the same way one a stricter expectations carry out reduce quantity of organizations integrated and you may a very lenient you might involve a lot of teams is ranked.
Centered on these requirements, 19 male subgroups (providers guys, dads from young children, police- and you can fire fighters, bachelors, steeped people, functions guys, delicate people, male people, outdoorsy guys, solitary fathers, helpful people, unmarried people, men leaders, old boys, homosexual boys, men academics, sporty boys, men political leaders, and rockers) and twenty two subgroups of females (unmarried moms and dads, ladies political figures, profession females, mothers from young kids, nurses, feminists, people youngsters, outdoorsy women, educators (the feminine types of the phrase in Norwegian was used), lesbians, old lady, blog writers, single girls, immigrant females, macho females, girls, lady painters, get it done girls, lady academics, style girls, housewives, and you can girls frontrunners) was basically selected.
Opting for organizations partly predicated on its salience throughout the airplane pilot shot isn’t in the place of dangers. Given that Fiske et al. (2002) discussed, both organizations eliciting aversion and also in-groups are less inclined to come. We understand that the listing of teams is limited in lots of ways: Like, the list will not have a complete listing of sexual orientations (elizabeth.grams., bisexual men or women are omitted, heterosexuality wasn’t stated regarding pilot and presumably removed to own granted), and you can “immigrants” were used in lieu of indicating certain ethnicities or countries regarding resource. We’re not indicating that our number try affiliate of your own subgroups that women and you will people will get get into. not, the fresh new organizations selected is outstanding on Norwegian context, and lots of of the provided gender subgroups was in fact known during the prior research in other federal contexts (Athenstaedt ainsi que al., 2008).
